Comprehensive Risk/Benefit Analysis for Administering COVID-19 Vaccines to Children
Since there is no such thing as a medical intervention that is 100% safe and effective for all people, a risk/benefit analysis is required in order to decide whether to undergo any medical intervention. Human health is highly personal, and health outcomes are determined by a myriad of factors such as genetic predisposition, age, diet, environmental toxins, pre-existing health conditions, other medications, etc. Our objective is to weigh the available data for risk of serious health outcome due to COVID-19 infection vs risk/benefit of COVID-19 vaccine intervention.
In doing so, a myriad of contextual information will be provided to gain a broad understanding of the truly expansive COVID-19 landscape. While this analysis is specifically geared toward children, the information provided is relevant to anyone making medical decisions related to COVID-19. What follows is not medical advice. Every situation is unique and medical professionals should be consulted when making health decisions.
2.1. Key Data Points
200 total deaths involving COVID-19 for age group 5-14 as of November 27, 2021 (compared to 334 for pneumonia over the same time period) - CDC
For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.9 additional conditions or causes per death - CDC
There have been 19,532 deaths, 99,943 hospitalizations, 102,602 urgent care visits, 9,746 heart attacks, 34,481 severe allergic reactions, 31,652 people permanently disabled, 15,424 cases of myocarditis/pericarditis reported following COVID-19 vaccination as of November 26, 2021 - CDC, VAERS
Naturally acquired immunity is superior to existing vaccines, and like all naturally acquired immunity it lasts a lifetime - Brownstone Institute
The key data points paint a pretty clear picture. Children, especially healthy children, are at zero risk of death from COVID-19. Given the significant spike in adverse reactions reported to CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the COVID-19 vaccines appear to be the most dangerous vaccines ever produced by a wide margin.
These charts from VAERS paint an ominous picture. In the top graph we see a relatively flat number of deaths reported over the entire history of the system until the COVID-19 vaccines rolled out, and then there is an enormous spike. The bottom graph tells us the vaccines are to blame for the deaths as most of the reports of death occur within the first 2 days after administration. There are more than two times the number of deaths reported in the past year (19,943) than all other years combined (8,746). One might say “well there are way more vaccines being administered because of the publicity of COVID-19 so we would expect to see more deaths,” but that math doesn’t add up.
Here is the CDC’s influenza vaccine distribution data for the past decade. During the 2019-2020 flu season there were 174.5 million doses distributed. The 2020-2021 flu season had 193.8 million doses distributed compared with 475 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines administered as of December 9, 2021. The flu vaccine is only 1 of 12 vaccines on the CDC immunization schedule. It’s safe to say the total vaccine doses administered every year surpass the number of COVID-19 vaccines that have been administered. Did we see anywhere near the number of deaths associated with those vaccines as we have for the COVID-19 vaccines? Absolutely not.
The above chart from VAERS compares deaths reported from COVID-19 vaccines vs deaths reported from influenza vaccines over the entire history of the VAERS system. We are looking at 3 decades of influenza vaccine deaths vs only 1 year of COVID-19 vaccine deaths and the COVID-19 vaccine deaths are about an order of magnitude higher.
The above tables from VAERS break down deaths by manufacturer, sex, and age. The age statistics are harder to compare at this point because the vaccines have rolled out for different age groups at different times. We would expect to see more deaths in the higher age groups because more people in those groups have received them.
Pfizer is leading the death count by a wide margin (13,039 vs 4,799 for Moderna) but they are also leading in the number of doses administered by a wide margin (276 million vs 181 million for Moderna). Pfizer has 58% of the doses administered and 66% of the death count while Moderna has 38% of the doses administered and 25% of the death count.
None of this is surprising given all the corners that were cut during operation warp speed (no animal trials, no long-term safety studies, etc). Side effects include blood clots, heart attacks, myocarditis, pericarditis, and bell’s palsy just to name a few. These are life threatening and debilitating reactions that are not matched by risks of COVID-19 infection in children, or even relatively healthy adults for that matter.
Vaccine creation is generally a decade-long process due to the long-term safety trials that are carried out, except when an emergency is declared of course. We have no idea what the long-term safety profiles of these vaccines are. Clinical trials in children are still ongoing and not set to complete for several years. Giving children, or anyone for that matter, these vaccines is the equivalent of turning them into a science experiment being conducted for profit by serial felons.
2.2. Most Corrupt Industry on Earth?
There is never a time when the pharmaceutical industry is free of controversy. It’s hard to definitively say it’s the most corrupt industry on Earth with such formidable competition in the banking and energy industries, but it certainly causes the most physical harm (ironic, isn’t it?). Here are just a few of the highlights from the shady past of the COVID-19 manufacturers.
A complete list of Pfizer’s criminal history can be found on Corporate Research Project and below are some of the most horrific highlights.
Pfizer paid the largest criminal fine in history, $2.3 billion for fraudulent marketing.
Pfizer was caught bribing officials in countries all over the world.
Pfizer settled lawsuits after testing risky meningitis drug on African children. Even worse, Pfizer hired investigators to dig up dirt on Nigeria’s attorney general in order to get the case dropped.
Pfizer knew Celebrex caused heart problems and kept it on the market anyway.
Pfizer subsidiary Warner-Lambert paid $430 million to resolve criminal and civil charges for paying doctors to prescribe Neurontin for unapproved uses. A federal jury later found that Pfizer committed racketeering fraud in its marketing of Neurontin and a judge ordered them to pay $142 million in damages.
A Pfizer scientist was awarded $1.37 million after claiming she was sickened by a genetically engineered virus at a company laboratory and then fired for raising safety concerns.
2.2.2. Johnson & Johnson
A complete list of Johnson & Johnson’s criminal history can also be found on Corporate Research Project and below are some of the most egregious highlights.
J&J paid more than $2.2 billion to resolve criminal and civil charges of off-label marketing (to children and elderly) of its antipsychotic Risperdal and providing kickbacks to doctors and pharmacists.
J&J knew since 1969 that its baby powder contained asbestos, a substance known to be a carcinogen since the early 70s, and it chose to poison babies for profit for 4 decades anyway.
J&J’s wholly owned subsidiary McNeil pleaded guilty to adulterating infants’ and children’s over the counter medication, meaning toxic foreign materials such as heavy metals were found in the medications.
A congressional investigation found that when J&J was faced with a recall of Motrin caplets that weren’t dissolving properly, instead of alerting the public and doing a proper recall they hired contractors to buy up the product from the stores.
J&J agreed to pay $5 billion to settle charges that its subsidiary Janssen Pharmaceuticals (developer of the J&J COVID-19 vaccine) improperly sold pain medications, contributing to the opioid epidemic.
J&J subsidiary LifeScan pleaded guilty to selling defective glucose monitors and giving false information to the FDA about the problem. It was fined $60 million and later paid $45 million to settle a class-action lawsuit.
Since Moderna has never brought a product to market before this vaccine, they do not yet have a corporate rap sheet. The odds heavily favor that they will have one in the future, potentially over this very vaccine. Moderna had to recall 1.6 million doses of their vaccine in Japan when it was discovered they were contaminated with stainless steel, which did kill people who got the tainted doses. That alone should be cause for a criminal investigation.
Moderna’s decade-long history as a company has been filled with empty promises, shell games, and secrecy. They have failed in every attempt to bring a product to market. In 2016 Moderna started phase 1 human trials on two vaccine candidates and declined to list those trials on clinicaltrials.gov as is standard protocol and refused to comment publicly on what diseases the vaccines were targeting. Moderna also chose to tout their technology in the media rather than publish clinical research to prove its efficacy. These actions clearly signal that Moderna values secrecy rather than transparency. As a 2017 article in STAT bluntly stated:
“[CEO] Bancel has repeatedly promised that Moderna’s new therapies will change the world, but the company has refused to publish any data on its mRNA vehicles, sparking skepticism from some scientists and a chiding from the editors of Nature.”
Moderna’s repeated failures appear to have placed it on the brink of total collapse leading into the pandemic, but at the last minute they were saved by the federal government with a $6 billion dollar injection of taxpayer money to fund the development of a COVID-19 vaccine. In what must be a true COVID-19 miracle, when it comes to this vaccine Moderna was somehow able to overcome all of the safety issues that plagued them in prior attempts, and they did it in record time. Call me a skeptic of shady corporations, but that sounds like a bit of a stretch.
2.2.4. Lobbying and Conflicts of Interest
Given the extensive criminal history of these companies and the fact that they are still allowed to operate can only mean we have a two-tiered justice system. In one tier we have corporations and members of the upper echelon of society responsible for millions of deaths and practically no one in jail. In the other tier we have, for example, over a million people incarcerated in the United States for marijuana (most for simple possession), a plant with well-established medicinal properties. The history of the pharmaceutical industry tells us that these organizations knowingly and repeatedly poison, kill, injure, and maim people for money. How are they allowed to get away with this? Part of the reason is the obscene amount of money they spend buying policy makers through lobbying. The industry spent a record $306 million in 2020 buying their way to policies and contracts that ultimately benefit them at our expense, with the entire health sector spending $643 million. Compare that to oil & gas who spent a mere $112 million lobbying in 2020, with the entire energy sector spending $221 million.
Goldman Sachs really exposed the ubiquitous conflicts of interest in the pharmaceutical industry when they pointed out that curing patients is not a sustainable business model.
“The potential to deliver ‘one shot cures’ is one of the most attractive aspects of gene therapy, genetically-engineered cell therapy and gene editing. However, such treatments offer a very different outlook with regard to recurring revenue versus chronic therapies,” analyst Salveen Richter wrote in the note to clients Tuesday. “While this proposition carries tremendous value for patients and society, it could represent a challenge for genome medicine developers looking for sustained cash flow.”
It should be clear to everyone by now that the pharmaceutical industry, and the healthcare industry in general, creates customers rather than cures and their investors are clearly holding them to that standard.
2.3. FDA is a Captured Agency
Keep in mind that all the issues of fraud, withholding safety information, knowingly poisoning people, etc coming from our trusted COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers happened under FDA approval. This is not surprising considering the revolving door between pharmaceutical executives and FDA leadership positions, and the fact that the FDA gets 75% of its funding from the industry it is supposed to be regulating. These conflicts of interest have made safety and efficacy issues of FDA approved products the norm rather than the exception (cue the TV ads asking if you’ve been injured by a pharmaceutical product).
The FDA routinely approves products in a hasty and unethical manner, even if its own scientists protest the approval. Earlier this year it approved Aduhelm, an extraordinarily expensive Alzheimer’s treatment, even though there was not a single scientist on the 11-member review panel that recommended approval. This led to three of those scientists resigning in protest.
"The primary beneficiaries of the agency's action are Biogen and its shareholders, who undoubtedly are ecstatic about their soon-to-be-reaped windfall profits from sales of the company's exorbitantly priced but ineffective drug," Michael Carome, the director of the Public Citizen's health research group wrote in a scathing 8-page letter to the FDA.
If the FDA served the public interest, why would they ask a judge to grant them until 2076, 55 years from now, to fully release Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine data? This truly unbelievable request was in response to Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) suing the FDA after it refused to produce the Pfizer documents. Yet again it becomes apparent that this vaccine is a medical experiment being conducted by criminal organizations and the FDA is doing everything they can to shield those organizations from scrutiny and legal action. The news of the FDA’s egregious request went viral and led to public pressure put on them to act. The FDA then produced the first 91 pages of data and the reason they wanted to hide it became crystal clear. One of the documents produced is a Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of [the Vaccine] Received Through 28-Feb-2021 which covers only the first 2½ months of adverse events reported. This document shows Pfizer received 42,086 reports containing 158,893 adverse events, truly astonishing numbers for only 2½ months of data. Most of the reports (29,914) involved women, and more than half (25,957) were classified as nervous system disorders.
2.4. VAERS Data
Given the shocking data on the dangerous nature of these vaccines, it’s no surprise that those who stand to benefit tremendously from the success of these vaccines have commissioned media hit pieces calling into question the reliability of the VAERS system. The fact of the matter is it’s the only publicly available system that tracks adverse events. The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) is a far more comprehensive system but it is under lock and key at the CDC, and to be honest it’s more than fair to question the motives behind keeping this data secret. Submissions to VAERS do require the submitter to attest that the report is accurate under threat of prosecution if false. The VAERS data is not as inaccurate as portrayed by some, however. Most of the reports filed to VAERS (72-83% depending on the source) come from healthcare workers, pharmaceutical companies, and government sources.
The bigger problem is VAERS doesn’t capture enough adverse events. Even though healthcare workers are required to report some adverse events and vaccine manufacturers are required to report all adverse events, a major Harvard study found that less than 1% of adverse events are actually reported to VAERS. Another study looking specifically at Guillain-Barré (potentially devastating paralysis) and anaphylaxis adverse reactions to vaccines found that only a subset of the adverse reactions from the VSD were captured by VAERS.
The signal coming from VAERS is telling us that something is very wrong, and that signal is corroborated by other sources. Data from the UK Health Security Agency show there have been thousands more deaths than the five-year average for causes including heart failure since the summer. There could be a myriad of factors contributing to this, such as shutting down healthcare services for “non-life-threatening” issues but given the established link between these vaccines and cardiac issues we cannot dismiss the fact that the vaccines are leading to some portion of these excess deaths.
The VAERS data is again corroborated by a recent analysis of UK data which shows that vaccinated people between the ages of 10-59 are dying at twice the rate of the unvaccinated in the same age group from all causes.
The VAERS data is once again corroborated by the World Health Organization’s VigiAccess database, which contains 2,706,410 adverse events reported due to COVID-19 vaccines as of December 9, 2021. Of the 2.7 million reports, 42% (1,135,411) were classified as nervous system disorders. Are we starting to see a pattern? For comparison VigiAccess only has 277,882 reports of adverse reactions to influenza vaccines, and that covers more than 40 years of reporting.
We have even further corroboration of the VAERS data by comparing reports of adverse reactions by state to the number of vaccinated people in each state. As expected, there is a strong correlation between those numbers. If there was a deluge of false reports, this graph would be all over the place. Instead, it’s neatly aligned with the only obvious outlier being Indiana. It’s possible Indiana received hot batches (tainted lots of vaccines) and this contributed to the excess reports, as this has been known to happen with other vaccines.
The CDC has also admitted myocarditis and pericarditis are happening, and yet they still have the audacity to recommend these vaccines to people who have no risk from COVID-19 infection. To solidify the matter further, American Heart Association recently published a study that describes the mechanism through which these mRNA vaccines are causing cardiac issues.
“We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”
Given the added publicity around COVID-19, it’s fair to assume VAERS is capturing more than 1% of adverse events, but still unreasonable to assume it’s capturing more than 50%. The reality is the shocking number of issues surfaced by VAERS is only a fraction of what’s really happening. We know the number of injuries and deaths related to the COVID-19 vaccines is unprecedented. The stories of vaccine victims are flooding the internet.
One such case of serious injury is professional mountain biker Kyle Warner who was diagnosed with pericarditis (inflammation of the tissue surrounding the heart) after the Pfizer vaccine. He recently shared his story of vaccine injury on YouTube. NBA player Brandon Goodwin admitted blood clots following his COVID-19 vaccine ended his season, and to make matters worse the team told him not to talk about it. Professional tennis player Jeremy Chardy also said his season was ended due to a series of problems from the Pfizer vaccine.
Athletes provide an interesting vector to understand what is going on in the larger population. Their public visibility makes tracking data around them much easier and more comprehensive. Disturbing montages of athletes collapsing during play have started circling on the internet. A running list of athlete collapses and deaths has revealed tragically expected results given most have been forced to get vaccinated to keep their position. Is anyone surprised at this point to see a huge spike after the vaccine rollout? Have we ever seen anything like this in prior years?
Professional athletes represent a tiny visible fraction of the vaccine issues and testimonials out there. There are thousands upon thousands of personal stories spread across social media. Even more disturbing is the fact that Big Tech platforms such as Facebook are actively censoring victims speaking out about their adverse reactions. Earlier this year Facebook deleted a 120,000 member group where victims shared their stories. This is not all that surprising given Mark Zuckerberg’s investments in vaccine development through his Chan Zuckerberg Biohub foundation. History tells us powerful people tend to throw ethics to the wayside and use the vast tools at their disposal to advance their interests. This is not really news, nor is it speculative.
We shouldn’t worry though. The Jerusalem Post recently pointed out that our science overlords are starting to study whether the mRNA vaccines, a technology with a history of safety issues (see Moderna STAT article again), will have long-term side effects after billions of people have already taken the experimental treatments. Someone seems to have reversed the order of operations here under the guise of needing to rush a treatment which could very easily lead to more death and destruction than the virus itself.
2.5. COVID-19 Risks Exaggerated
Flu and pneumonia practically disappeared ever since COVID-19 was commonplace in our lexicon, with the CDC saying cases went from 39 million in the 2019-2020 season to just 2,124 in the 2020-2021 season. That’s quite literally an unbelievable drop. The media were quick to champion masks and social distancing as the obvious reason despite zero scientific evidence, logic, or data to support the claim. Without serious science to back it up, there is absolutely no reason to believe those measures stopped one seasonal respiratory virus but allowed another to flourish.
There is an extensive body of high quality science on the matter of masks, and it conclusively shows they do not prevent viral transmission in a highly controlled hospital setting where practitioners are trained on proper mask usage. If they don’t work in a highly controlled setting, they certainly don’t work in a public setting where most people are displaying the exact opposite of proper mask protocol. There is also a recent study out of Denmark that further solidifies the conclusion that public masking is not effective for COVID-19 transmission. We also cannot overlook the potential negative side effects of masking, of which there is again an extensive body of evidence telling us the risks far outweigh the nonexistent benefits, especially for children. A recent study out of Brown University that found a 23% decline in children’s cognitive development since the pandemic had this to say:
“Masks worn in public settings and in school or daycare settings may impact a range of early developing skills, such as attachment, facial processing, and socioemotional processing.”
“Comparing yearly mean scores since 2011, controlling for age, gender, demographic, and socioeconomic indicators, we find striking evidence of declining overall cognitive functioning in children beginning in 2020 and continuing through 2021.”
So, if the antidote wasn’t masking and social distancing, what was it? It turns out the antidote to flu and pneumonia was most likely fraud in the form of PCR testing. The quality of data that can be obtained from a PCR test is dependent on the cycle threshold used when analyzing samples. The cycle threshold is the number of times the sample goes through an amplification process. As anyone might expect who has ever turned their stereo up too high, the more amplification, the more the source data is distorted and loses context. Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize winner for his invention of PCR, said this about PCR tests:
“With PCR, you can find almost anything in anybody”.
“It allows you to take a very miniscule amount of anything and make it measurable and then talk about it in meetings and stuff like it is important. That’s not a misuse, that’s just sort of a misinterpretation”.
“It doesn’t tell you that you’re sick and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with was really going to hurt you or anything like that”.
We also have a panel of top scientists who meticulously peer-reviewed PCR testing protocol and found 10 major scientific flaws that have led to false positives. In a section titled What is important when designing an RT-PCR Test and the quantitative RT-qPCR test described in the Corman-Drosten publication?, they dropped this bombshell:
“The number of amplification cycles (less than 35; preferably 25-30 cycles); In case of virus detection, >35 cycles only detects signals which do not correlate with infectious virus as determined by isolation in cell culture [reviewed in 2]; if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the case in most laboratories in Europe & the US), the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, the probability that said result is a false positive is 97% [reviewed in 3].”
You read that correctly. Laboratories in the U.S. and all over the world are deliberately using a cycle threshold known to have a false positive rate of 97%. That sounds like a surefire way to create an extremely successful fear-based vaccine marketing campaign, and an utterly disastrous way to shape public policy that benefits society. Given the amount of power the pharmaceutical industry and its investors have over our world, would anyone be surprised if they were behind this PCR fraud? With hundreds of billions in potential revenue on the line, I don’t think we can overlook the possibility.
The PCR review’s concluding remarks leave no doubt about the reliability of the testing protocol that has underpinned this entire pandemic:
“In light of our re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless.”
Given this, we can be quite certain that the flu did not magically disappear last season. A good portion of the cases and deaths attributed to COVID-19 were based on false assumptions and false positive PCR tests. The CDC guidance starting in March 2020 told those filling out death certificates to add COVID-19 to the death certificate if it is merely assumed to have contributed to the death.
“It is important to emphasize that Coronavirus Disease 2019 or COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.”
After this guidance was released, doctors started reporting that they were being pressured by hospitals to fraudulently list COVID-19 on death certificates when it was not a cause of death. Why? Because there were financial incentives for hospitals to report everything under the sun as COVID-19.
"Hospital administrators might well want to see COVID-19 attached to a discharge summary or a death certificate. Why? Because if it's a straightforward, garden-variety pneumonia that a person is admitted to the hospital for—if they're Medicare—typically, the diagnosis-related group lump sum payment would be $5,000. But if it's COVID-19 pneumonia, then it's $13,000, and if that COVID-19 pneumonia patient ends up on a ventilator, it goes up to $39,000." - Dr. Scott Jensen
Not only did this incentivize hospitals to inflate the COVID-19 death count, but it also incentivized them to put as many people on ventilators as possible. We now know that the ventilator protocol used for COVID-19 patients went against standard protocol, destroyed people’s lungs, and cost countless thousands of lives. A JAMA study revealed that 9 out of 10 COVID-19 patients that went on a ventilator died. Early on in the ventilator bloodbath there were multiple whistleblowers who risked their careers to speak out against the ventilator protocol, such as New York E.R. doctor Cameron Kyle-Sidell. Dr Kyle-Sidell had this to say:
“I’ve talked to doctors all around the country and it is becoming increasingly clear that the pressure we’re providing may be hurting their lungs, that it is highly likely that the high pressures we’re using are damaging the lungs of the patients we are putting the breathing tubes in,”
“We ran into an impasse where I could not morally, in a patient-doctor relationship, I could not continue the current protocols which again, are the protocols at the top hospitals in the country,”
“These patients are slowly being starved of oxygen … and while they look like patients absolutely on the brink of death, they do not look like patients dying of pneumonia.”
Dr. Kyle-Sidell pleaded with the medical community to change their protocols and stop needlessly killing people that might otherwise make it with a proper treatment of oxygen, and did they listen? No. The ventilator hysteria went on and on, with governors fighting over which state would get more ventilators from the federal government, and some even threatening to seize ventilators from private hospitals and redistributing them as they saw fit. In a bold display of overarching government control, General Motors was even ordered to switch from producing cars to ventilators as some estimated the U.S. needed 200,000 lung destroying machines produced. How many in the COVID death count were innocent people killed by a procedure after it became clear it was harmful? We’ll never know, but we certainly know it was way more than the acceptable level of zero. We also cannot overlook the fact that the government was essentially paying hospitals to kill people, and the hospitals eagerly complied.
Another seemingly murderous government policy was the nursing home policy some states adopted. One of the most disastrous policies was that of the disgraced former New York governor Cuomo. His policy to force nursing homes to take symptomatic COVID patients led to New York having the highest nursing home death count, and worse yet he tried to cover it up. Again, all of this happened despite very loud opposition to the obviously deadly policies.
Given that deaths were attributed to COVID-19 based on assumption and coercion, deadly policies and protocols were being enacted across the country by the people in charge of this pandemic, human errors in judgment were rampant, and the absolute failure of PCR tests, we can be certain that we have an inflated COVID-19 death count, and we will never have an accurate number. Furthermore, Occam's razor is screaming loud and clear that the plummet in flu and pneumonia cases and deaths is due to their rebranding as COVID-19.
And yet, given the mountains of fraud and fear-inducing propaganda circulating around risk, if you take the numbers at face value, they still aren’t scary, especially for young people. According to a paper published in Nature, all age groups under 65 have a 99+% recovery rate and children 5-14 having a 99.999% recovery rate.
2.6. The Vaccines Are Ineffective
When we have the most vaccinated states leading the surge of new cases, cases falling in the least vaccinated states, and more COVID attributed deaths in 2021 than 2020, how can we come to any conclusion but the most obvious and logical one? The vaccines are not working. A recent study published in Springer examined vaccination rates in 68 countries and 2947 U.S. counties and compared that against COVID-19 case rates. Here’s what they found:
“At the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days (Fig. 1). In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people. Notably, Israel with over 60% of their population fully vaccinated had the highest COVID-19 cases per 1 million people in the last 7 days. The lack of a meaningful association between percentage population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases is further exemplified, for instance, by comparison of Iceland and Portugal. Both countries have over 75% of their population fully vaccinated and have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than countries such as Vietnam and South Africa that have around 10% of their population fully vaccinated.”
As the findings state, the trend line goes up and to the right, indicating negative efficacy instead of down and to the right which would indicate positive efficacy. To understand further how the pharmaceutical industry has lied (don’t forget the lies have been rubber stamped by the FDA) about the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines, read about an analysis of the trials done by Dr Maryanne Demasi.
In her post, Demasi highlights one of the most commonly used tricks in the book — conflating absolute and relative risk reduction. As noted by Demasi, AstraZeneca and Australia’s health minister, Greg Hunt, claimed the AstraZeneca injection offered “100% protection” against COVID-19 death. How did they get this number? Demasi explains:
“In the trial of 23,848 subjects … there was one death in the placebo group and no deaths in the vaccinated group. One less death out of a total of one, indeed was a relative reduction of 100%, but the absolute reduction was 0.01%.”
Similarly, Pfizer’s COVID shot was said to be 95% effective against the infection, but this too is the relative risk reduction, not the absolute reduction. The absolute risk reduction for Pfizer’s shot was a meager 0.84%.
So, our miracle savior for the super scary infection with a 99+% recovery rate for almost everyone is an injection that can cause life-threatening cardiac issues and is only 0.84% effective at the one job it has? Please internet, tell me more about this miracle cure. Right on cue, once again Dr Maryanne Demasi:
According to Gerd Gigerenzer, director of the Harding Centre for Risk Literacy at the Max Planck Institute, only quoting the relative risk reduction is a “sin” against transparent communication, as it can be used as a “deliberate tactic to manipulate or persuade people.” Demasi also quotes John Ioannidis, professor at Stanford University, who told her:
“This is not happening just for vaccines. Over many decades, RRR [relative risk reduction] has been the dominant way of communicating results of clinical trials. Almost always, RRR looks nicer than absolute risk reductions.”
At this point it should be obvious that the pharmaceutical industry works for themselves and their investors and couldn’t care less about the public’s health which they are supposed to serve. As such, they regularly advertise the deceptive relative risk reduction metric instead of accurately advertising absolute risk reduction, which is one of the reasons they are constantly embroiled in deceptive marketing lawsuits. This little trick is known as lying with statistics.
A recent study published in the prestigious Lancet journal minces no words about the error in our ways:
“High COVID-19 vaccination rates were expected to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in populations by reducing the number of possible sources for transmission and thereby to reduce the burden of COVID-19 disease. Recent data, however, indicate that the epidemiological relevance of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals is increasing.”
“In the UK it was described that secondary attack rates among household contacts exposed to fully vaccinated index cases was similar to household contacts exposed to unvaccinated index cases (25% for vaccinated vs 23% for unvaccinated). 12 of 31 infections in fully vaccinated household contacts (39%) arose from fully vaccinated epidemiologically linked index cases. Peak viral load did not differ by vaccination status or variant type [].”
“In Germany, the rate of symptomatic COVID-19 cases among the fully vaccinated (“breakthrough infections”) is reported weekly since 21. July 2021 and was 16.9% at that time among patients of 60 years and older []. This proportion is increasing week by week and was 58.9% on 27. October 2021 (Figure 1) providing clear evidence of the increasing relevance of the fully vaccinated as a possible source of transmission.”
“A similar situation was described for the UK. Between week 39 and 42, a total of 100.160 COVID-19 cases were reported among citizens of 60 years or older. 89.821 occurred among the fully vaccinated (89.7%), 3.395 among the unvaccinated (3.4%) []. One week before, the COVID-19 case rate per 100.000 was higher among the subgroup of the vaccinated compared to the subgroup of the unvaccinated in all age groups of 30 years or more.”
“In Israel a nosocomial outbreak was reported involving 16 healthcare workers, 23 exposed patients and two family members. The source was a fully vaccinated COVID-19 patient. The vaccination rate was 96.2% among all exposed individuals (151 healthcare workers and 97 patients). Fourteen fully vaccinated patients became severely ill or died, the two unvaccinated patients developed mild disease [].”
“The U.S. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies four of the top five counties with the highest percentage of fully vaccinated population (99.9–84.3%) as “high” transmission counties [].”
“Many decision makers assume that the vaccinated can be excluded as a source of transmission. It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures.”
All of this is quite stunning against the backdrop of governments all over the world advancing their campaigns to force and coerce their populations to get vaccinated. Don’t think for a second they don’t have the data I’m presenting. They do, and they are ramming these dangerous ineffective products down our throats anyway. While government actions across the globe appear to mostly be in lockstep, just as was suspiciously outlined by the Lock Step scenario in the Rockefeller Foundation document “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” published in 2010, some are taking more extreme measures than others. Australia has seen one of the most tyrannical implementations of COVID measures despite being largely spared from the pandemic, with their government now forcibly throwing people in quarantine camps who test positive with a faulty test, including indigenous tribe members and leaders whose societal structure is completely separate from mainstream society. One can’t help but see analogies of Nazi Germany playing out in real-time. We owe it to ourselves and all of humanity to seriously investigate their motives, and whether those motives are being driven by power structures above governments. When we have nearly 100% of the civilized world marching to the exact same beat of fraud, fear, corruption, and manipulation, it becomes hard to ignore the idea that there is some organizing force directing all of this at the global level.
2.7. Study Examining the Risk/Benefit for Children
There is an in-depth study that examined the very same risk/benefit question as we are unpacking here and reached similar conclusions. Here are some excerpts from the study’s findings:
2.7.1. On the Risk/Benefit
“First, where is the data justifying inoculation for children, much less most people under forty? It's not found on Fig. 1, where the most vulnerable are almost exclusively the elderly with many comorbidities. Yet, in the USA, Pfizer has been approved to inoculate children 12–17, and the goal is to accomplish this by the start of the school year in the Fall. As stated previously, there are plans to inoculate children as young as six months starting before the end of 2021.
What is the rush for a group at essentially zero risks? Given that the inoculations were tested only for a few months, only very short-term adverse effects could be obtained. It is questionable how well even these short-term effects obtained from the clinical trials reflect the short-term effects from the initial mass inoculation results reported in VAERS.
Fig. 1, Fig. 2 reflect only these very short-term results. A number of researchers have suggested the possibility of severe longer-term autoimmune, Antibody-Dependent Enhancement, neurological, and other potentially serious effects, with lag periods ranging from months to years. If such effects do turn out to be real, the children are the ones who will have to bear the brunt of the suffering. There appear to be no benefits for the children and young adults from the inoculations and only Costs!”
2.7.2. On the Dangers
“It is becoming clear that the central ingredient of the injection, the recipe for the spike protein, will produce a product that can have three effects. Two of the three occur with the production of antibodies to the spike protein. These antibodies could allegedly offer protection against the virus (although with all the "breakthrough" cases reported, that is questionable), or could suppress serious symptoms to some extent. They could also cross-react with human tissue antigen, leading to potential autoimmune effects. The third occurs when the injected material enters the bloodstream and circulates widely, which is enabled by the highly vascular injection site and the use of the PEG-2000 coating.
This allows spike protein to be manufactured/expressed in endothelial cells at any location in the body, both activating platelets to cause clotting and causing vascular damage. It is difficult to believe this effect is unknown to the manufacturer, and in any case, has been demonstrated in myriad locations in the body using VAERS data. There appears to be modest benefit from the inoculations to the elderly population most at risk, no benefit to the younger population not at risk, and much potential for harm from the inoculations to both populations. It is unclear why this mass inoculation for all groups is being done, being allowed, and being promoted.”
“The injection goes two steps further than the wild virus because 1) it contains the instructions for making the spike protein, which several experiments are showing can cause vascular and other forms of damage, and 2) it bypasses many front-line defenses of the innate immune system to enter the bloodstream directly in part. Unlike the virus example, the injection ensures there will always be some combustible materials on the floor, even if there are no other toxic exposures or behaviors. In other words, the spike protein and the surrounding LNP are toxins with the potential to cause myriad short-, mid-, and long-term adverse health effects even in the absence of other contributing factors! Where and when these effects occur will depend on the biodistribution of the injected material. Pfizer’s own biodistribution studies have shown the injected material can be found in myriad critical organs throughout the body, leading to the possibility of multi-organ failure. And these studies were from a single injection. Multiple injections and booster shots may have cumulative effects on organ distributions of inoculant!”
2.7.3. On Comorbidities
“The people with myriad comorbidities in the age range where most deaths with COVID-19 occurred were in very poor health. Their deaths did not seem to increase all-cause mortality as shown in several studies. If they hadn't died with COVID-19, they probably would have died from the flu or many of the other comorbidities they had. We can't say for sure that many/most died from COVID-19 because of: 1) how the PCR tests were manipulated to give copious false positives and 2) how deaths were arbitrarily attributed to COVID-19 in the presence of myriad comorbidities.”
“As stated before, CDC showed that 94 % of the reported deaths had multiple comorbidities, thereby reducing the CDC's numbers attributed strictly to COVID-19 to about 35,000 for all age groups. Given the number of high false positives from the high amplification cycle PCR tests, and the willingness of healthcare professionals to attribute death to COVID-19 in the absence of tests or sometimes even with negative PCR tests, this 35,000 number is probably highly inflated as well.”
2.7.4. On Vaccine Related Deaths
“On the latter issue, both Virginia Stoner and Jessica Rose have shown independently that the deaths following inoculation are not coincidental and are strongly related to inoculation through strong clustering around the time of injection. Our independent analyses of the VAERS database reported in Appendix 1 confirmed these clustering findings.”
2.7.5. Corroborating Report
Another report titled COVID-19 Vaccines and Children - A Scientist’s Guide for Parents by Dr. Byram W. Bridle also reached similar conclusions.
“The risk of severe and potentially lethal COVID-19 in these specific populations is so low that we need to be very certain that risks associated with mass vaccination are not higher;”
“Asymptomatic members of this population are not a substantial risk for passing COVID-19 to others; and”
“There are effective early-treatment strategies and considerations for the very few children, adolescents, and young adults of child-bearing age who may be at risk of developing severe COVID-19.”
3. Experts Weigh In
There are thousands of scientists and experts all over the world speaking out and sharing data that proves the policies and recommendations being enacted by policymakers are in blatant error. These highly decorated experts get little to no airtime on the corporate media so most have never heard of them or the data they are sharing. Here I will highlight just a few that have spoken on some of the most important topics surrounding COVID-19 vaccines and public policy. If you want to know more about the scientists who are speaking out, a good place to start is The Great Barrington Declaration, a statement signed by tens of thousands of scientists and doctors against the policies that have been enacted in lockstep across the world.
3.1. Geert Vanden Bossche and Luc Montagnier
Not only do the vaccinated risk serious adverse reactions, but they could be destroying their immune system’s ability to fight infection and turning their body into a variant factory. This is according to one of the top vaccine scientists in the world, Geert Vanden Bossche. His lengthy resume includes senior positions at The Gates Foundation and GAVI, and Head of Vaccine Development at the German Center for Vaccine Research. Here’s what he had to say about the devastating effects that mass COVID-19 vaccination will lead to.
“Conducting mass vaccination campaigns on a background of high infection rates generates optimal conditions for breeding even more infectious Sars-CoV-2 variants. The combination of massive, spike-directed immune pressure combined with high infectious pressure rapidly allows these variants to reproduce more effectively such as to outcompete previously circulating variants/ strains. Mass vaccination, therefore, promotes viral evolution towards more infectious variants. The resulting enhancement of viral infectious pressure makes it more likely for everyone, including healthy, unvaccinated people to come in contact with the virus, especially in times where infection prevention measures are loosened. To the extent that high infection rates cause people to become re-exposed shortly after a previous asymptomatic infection, their innate Sars-CoV-binding antibodies (Abs) will be suppressed by short-lived, poorly functional anti-spike Abs, known to not be responsible for preventing the infection from becoming symptomatic.
Extending mass vaccination campaigns to these younger age groups is the most irresponsible public health proposal (decision?) ever as
1. it results in turning a huge cohort of naturally protected people into subjects who will soon become much more vulnerable because the virus is now becoming increasingly resistant to vaccinal Abs (which, despite poor functionality, are still able to suppress broadly protective innate Abs).
2. it further augments pressure on viral infectiousness (i.e., on spike protein, which happens to be the target of all C-19 vaccines!) and, therefore, will only contribute to expediting viral evolution towards enhanced infectiousness (and eventually full resistance to anti-S Abs). As already mentioned, the higher viral infectivity rates grow, the more the incredibly precious innate immune capacity of the population gets eroded and the faster vaccine-mediated protection will wane as a result of enhanced evolution of the virus towards S-Ab-directed resistance. In the meantime – and for as long the C-19 vaccines protect against disease – mass vaccination is turning healthy people into asymptomatic breeding grounds and spreaders of evolving, more infectious variants, which is quite the opposite effect of what mass vaccination was supposed to do (i.e., to generate herd immunity). We only begin to see the early consequences of waning vaccine protection, erosion of innate immunity and fulminant expansion of steadily evolving, more infectious variants.”
These are truly stunning statements by one of the most experienced vaccinologists in the world. One might think given Geert’s stature that his analysis would be front-page news, but that would require the false assumption that corporate media is free from pharmaceutical conflicts of interests. To get a small taste of how deep the conflicts of interest go, you can watch a montage of media coverage announcing its affiliation to Pfizer on YouTube.
These views on mass COVID-19 vaccination are not just held by one heavyweight scientist. Dr Luc Montagnier, recipient of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine for his discovery of the HIV virus, has echoed the same perspective and been crucified by the media for doing so. Dr. Montagnier, along with Dr. Richard Fleming and neuroscientist Kevin W. McCairn, have submitted sworn affidavits to the International Criminal Court stating these claims and will be providing expert testimony in the proceedings for crimes against humanity, should the court decide to take on the monumental case.
A recent study published in American Chemical Society also appears to be zeroing in on what Dr. Vanden Bossche is saying:
“By tracking the evolutionary trajectories of vaccine-resistant mutations in more than 2.2 million SARS-CoV-2 genomes, we reveal that the occurrence and frequency of vaccine-resistant mutations correlate strongly with the vaccination rates in Europe and America.”
It’s becoming clearer by the day that we are going to look back in horror at this tragic and misguided time we are currently living through.
3.2. Peter Doshi
Senior editor of the British Medical Journal Peter Doshi explains how the phase 3 trials conducted by pharmaceutical companies who stand to make tens of billions per year off of their product were designed to create deceptive marketing campaigns rather than provide solid evidence these vaccines are safe and effective.
In a September interview Medscape editor in chief Eric Topol pondered what counts as a recorded “event” in the vaccine trials. “We’re not talking about just a PCR [polymerase chain reaction test]-positive mild infection. It has to be moderate to severe illness to qualify as an event, correct?” he asked.
“That’s right,” concurred his guest, Paul Offit, a vaccinologist who sits on the FDA advisory committee that may ultimately recommend the vaccines for licence or emergency use authorisation.
But that’s not right. In all the ongoing phase III trials for which details have been released, laboratory confirmed infections even with only mild symptoms qualify as meeting the primary endpoint definition. In Pfizer and Moderna’s trials, for example, people with only a cough and positive laboratory test would bring those trials one event closer to their completion. (If AstraZeneca’s ongoing UK trial is designed similarly to its “paused” U.S. trial for which the company has released details, a cough and fever with positive PCR test would suffice.)
So not only were the trials conducted with only mild cases (which would almost certainly resolve without intervention in healthy people anyway), but more troubling is that Paul Offit, FDA advisory committee member, is either lying about this or hasn’t even read the trial literature he’s speaking about.
In the trials, final efficacy analyses are planned after just 150 to 160 “events,”—that is, a positive indication of symptomatic covid-19, regardless of severity of the illness.
As we saw with the article on Dr Maryanne Demasi’s analysis, those impressive efficacy numbers you’ve heard touted by the media, politicians, scientists, and doctors are based on less than 200 cases and only represent the deceptive relative risk reduction percentage. Of the thousands of people in the trials, all but these few are excluded in the end to produce the desired outcome. We call that $cience, the antithesis of real science.
“Our trial will not demonstrate prevention of transmission,” Zaks said, “because in order to do that you have to swab people twice a week for very long periods, and that becomes operationally untenable.”
He repeatedly emphasised these “operational realities” of running a vaccine trial. “Every trial design, especially phase III, is always a balancing act between different needs,” he said. “If you wanted to have an answer on an endpoint that happens at a frequency of one 10th or one fifth the frequency of the primary endpoint, you would need a trial that is either 5 or 10 times larger or you’d need a trial that is 5 or 10 times longer to collect those events. Neither of these, I think, are acceptable in the current public need for knowing expeditiously that a vaccine works.”
Prevention of transmission was not even studied. That means all claims of getting vaccinated to protect others are based on false assumptions and lies. So why are millions of people being lied to and coerced into taking a dangerous countermeasure that is nothing more than a personal treatment? These vaccines didn’t even meet the definition of a vaccine prior to the CDC changing the definition of a vaccination in 2021, a move overtly telling us they work for industry instead of citizens.
Definition prior to 2015:
Injection of a killed or weakened infectious organism in order to prevent the disease.
The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.
The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.
We went from something that prevents a disease to something that produces immunity to a disease to something that produces protection from a disease. Protection from a disease is local to an individual. Not only do we have industry telling us that there is no benefit provided to others by getting the vaccine, but the CDC is also echoing that message. So again, why are the powers that shouldn’t be doing everything they can to coerce every single person on Earth into taking these dangerous products? Peter Doshi advises us to learn from the history of vaccines.
“History shows many examples of serious adverse events from vaccines brought to market in periods of enormous pressure and expectation. There were contaminated polio vaccines in 1955, cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome in recipients of flu vaccines in 1976, and narcolepsy linked to one brand of influenza vaccine in 2009.”
Vaccines are a serious medical intervention. Foreign substances, often extremely toxic and carcinogenic, being injected into muscle tissue bypasses the body’s filtration systems resulting in toxic loads some are incapable of dealing with. The decision to undergo a vaccine always needs to be weighed against personal risk of the infection.
“You can’t convince minority populations to get this vaccine unless they are represented in these trials. Otherwise, they’re going to feel like they’re guinea pigs, and understandably so.”
The history of vaccines has shown us that many factors contribute to the risk profile for specific individuals or groups of people including race, age, and genetic markers. Since it is impossible to study all variations of humanity for every vaccine, there is inherent unknown, unavoidable risk for all people undergoing any vaccine. For this reason, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) was created in 1986. The pharmaceutical industry was facing too many lawsuits from vaccine injuries and exerted their power over the U.S. government to grant them blanket immunity from liability for all vaccines. To date, the NVICP has paid out $4.6 billion to injured parties. However, since COVID-19 vaccines are under emergency use authorization they are the domain of the PREP Act which shields the government from tort claims, and therefore it will be nearly impossible to obtain compensation for injuries or death. The only way for anyone to receive compensation would be to win a case against the Department of Justice proving there was willful misconduct involved, a tall and costly order.
3.3. Martin Kulldorff And Jay Bhattacharya
According to tens of thousands of scientists, doctors, and professors who have signed The Great Barrington Declaration including those of the highest status like Harvard professor of medicine, epidemiologist, and biostatistician Dr. Martin Kulldorff and professor of health policy at Stanford School of Medicine Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Fauci has been wrong about this pandemic from day 1 and his decisions and leadership have cost countless lives.
“By pushing vaccine mandates, Dr. Fauci ignores naturally acquired immunity among the COVID-recovered, of which there are more than 45 million in the United States. Mounting evidence indicates that natural immunity is stronger and longer lasting than vaccine-induced immunity.
We have known about natural immunity from disease at least since the Athenian Plague in 430 BC. Pilots, truckers and longshoremen know about it, and nurses know it better than anyone. Under Fauci's mandates, hospitals are firing heroic nurses who recovered from COVID they contracted while caring for patients. With their superior immunity, they can safely care for the oldest and frailest patients with even lower transmission risk than the vaccinated.”
The rhetoric coming from government and media around vaccination being the only way forward is unequivocally propaganda aimed at driving pharmaceutical profits, among other things.
“Schools are major transmission points for influenza, but not for COVID. While children do get infected, their risk for COVID death is minuscule, lower than their already low risk of dying from the flu. Throughout the 2020 spring wave, Sweden kept daycare and schools open for all its 1.8 million children ages 1 to 15, with no masks, testing or social distancing. The result? Zero COVID deaths among children and a COVID risk to teachers lower than the average of other professions. In fall 2020, most European countries followed suit, with similar results. Considering the devastating effects of school closures on children, Dr. Fauci's advocacy for school closures may be the single biggest mistake of his career.”
The data is extremely clear that children are not at risk of contracting or spreading COVID-19 and yet, they are bearing the greatest weight of the pandemic response policies. They’ve missed school, critical social interaction, and facial expressions. Now they are being asked to risk their lives and their health for adults irrationally paralyzed by fear. We’ve seriously lost the plot.
“In private conversations, most of our scientific colleagues agree with us on these points. While a few have spoken up, why are not more doing so? Well, some tried but failed. Others kept silent when they saw colleagues slandered and smeared in the media or censored by Big Tech. Some are government employees who are barred from contradicting official policy. Many are afraid of losing positions or research grants, aware that Dr. Fauci sits on top of the largest pile of infectious disease research money in the world. Most scientists are not experts on infectious disease outbreaks. Were we, say, oncologists, physicists or botanists, we would probably also have trusted Dr. Fauci.
The evidence is in. Governors, journalists, scientists, university presidents, hospital administrators and business leaders can continue to follow Dr. Anthony Fauci or open their eyes. After 700,000-plus COVID deaths and the devastating effects of lockdowns, it is time to return to basic principles of public health.”
Science is controlled and steered by powerful interests. Media is controlled by powerful interests. Politicians and policymakers are controlled by powerful interests. Big Tech is controlled by powerful interests. This results in widespread scientific fraud, silencing and censoring of scientists who don’t parrot the official narrative, and ultimately failures in policy that cost thousands if not millions of lives.
4. Safe and Effective Treatments
The entire basis of the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for these vaccines is built on the lie that there are no other existing effective treatments.
“Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.”
Since there are other treatments that have been proven to be safe and effective, the EUA is technically null and void, or it would be if we had an ethical FDA that worked for the people instead of for industry. Some of the known treatments are as straightforward and basic as Vitamin C and Vitamin D. Budesonide, a very common asthma medication, has also shown to be an effective treatment. You view the full list of studied treatments and get an overview of the clinical trials on them at c19early.com. I will primarily focus on the two most studied and most politicized treatments. These are treatments that aren’t going to make the pharmaceutical industry hundreds of billions of dollars over the next few years, so they must be demonized in order to protect the cash cow.
Despite what the media say or what issues there are with any one specific study, the fact of the matter is there are many studies and meta-analyses of those studies that show Ivermectin (IVM) is safe and effective in treating COVID-19. A meta-analysis of 15 trials had this to say.
“Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.”
Another meta-analysis came to similar conclusions.
“Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.”
Ivermectin has shown real-world success around the globe, especially in places that didn’t have immediate access to vaccines and had no choice but to look at other options.
The demonization of Ivermectin in the media reveals who pays their bills and who they work for, and this egregious deception should be prosecuted. It’s also interesting how the Ministry of Truth “fact-checking” organizations, who are funded by the pharmaceutical industry and its investors, haven’t fact checked the media’s completely false claims on Ivermectin.
Another treatment heavily politicized and demonized by the media is Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Once again, the data is telling us it works and it’s safe. A meta-analysis published by American Journal of Epidemiology had this to say:
“Five studies, including 2 controlled clinical trials, have demonstrated significant major outpatient treatment efficacy. HCQ + AZ has been used as the standard of care in more than 300,000 older adults with multiple comorbid conditions; the estimated proportion of such patients diagnosed with cardiac arrhythmia attributable to the medications is 47 per 100,000 users, among whom estimated mortality is less than 20% (9/100,000 users), as compared with the 10,000 Americans now dying each week. These medications need to be made widely available and promoted immediately for physicians to prescribe.”
Yes, there are studies that showed the opposite effect. The most notable are the World Health Organization (WHO) Solidarity and the UK Recovery trials. There is just one problem with those trials...they were administering lethal doses of HCQ.
“The Recovery trial used 1.86 grams hydroxychloroquine base (equal to 2400 mg of hydroxychloroquine) in the first 24 hours for treatment of already very ill, hospitalized Covid-19 patients. The Canadian and Norwegian Solidarity trials used 2,000 mg of HCQ, or 1.55 grams of HCQ base in the first 24 hours.
Each trial gave patients a cumulative dose during the first 24 hours that, when given as a single dose, has been documented to be lethal. (The drug’s half-life is about a month, so the cumulative amount is important.)
The doses used in these trials are not recommended for therapy of any medical condition, which I confirmed with Goodman and Gilman’s Pharmacology textbook, the drug’s U.S. label, and the online subscription medical encyclopedia UptoDate.
Excessive, dangerous HCQ dosing continues to be used in WHO’s Solidarity trials. While the Solidarity trials have an “adaptive” design which allows midstream protocol changes, no lessons were learned from the Brazil or Recovery trials’ experience with excessive dosages. Solidarity has not reduced its HCQ dosing, although it can do so at any time.
The Solidarity trials are not, in fact, testing the benefits of HCQ on Covid-19, but rather are testing whether patients survive toxic, non-therapeutic doses.”
There was also The Lancet HCQ study that was touted by the media because it fit their agenda (the agenda of their investors), but was retracted only 13 days after publication when the data was found to be blatantly fraudulent.
If the WHO is willing to intentionally kill people to achieve their political and financial goals as it relates to HCQ, one can make a solid educated guess as to whether this is an organization benefiting humanity or harming it. There is a plethora of information out there on the misdeeds and corruption of the WHO, some of which is summarized brilliantly by James Corbett, and also by Lilian Franck in her film TrustWHO. It has become abundantly clear over the years that the WHO is a tool of the pharmaceutical industry and those who wish to exert tremendous influence over society.
5. Pfizer Whistleblower
Few people understand the risks to life and livelihood that someone undertakes to blow the whistle on a behemoth like Pfizer. Whistleblowers have a long history of having their lives destroyed or worse after exposing governments and corporations. In this case, it’s really no surprise given Pfizer’s criminal history that there is a whistleblower at Pfizer providing evidence that the company falsified data and behaved extremely unethically.
“In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open letter to the billions of people around the world who were investing their hopes in a safe and effective covid-19 vaccine to end the pandemic. “As I’ve said before, we are operating at the speed of science,” Bourla wrote, explaining to the public when they could expect a Pfizer vaccine to be authorised in the United States.1
But, for researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety. A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day. Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails.”
And wouldn’t you know it, less than 1 month after BMJ published the story of the whistleblower Pfizer is in the news lobbying to fight an update to the False Claims Act that has been proposed to give whistleblowers greater protection against potential industry retaliation and make it more difficult for companies charged with fraud to dismiss cases on procedural grounds. The False Claims Act has been neutered by a series of federal court decisions that made it extremely easy to get whistleblower cases dismissed on ridiculous technicalities and the proposed update is aimed at correcting that. Pfizer really has no shame when it comes to protecting their financial interests against all interests of the general public. The powers that shouldn’t be constantly show malice toward those who expose them. You don’t have to look any further than Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, or Chelsea Manning to see that. In yet another example of the two-tier system, the people exposing the crimes of the powerful are rotting in jail or exile while the people who committed the crimes are freely and undoubtedly committing more crimes.
6. CDC Corruption
Much like the FDA, the CDC has devolved into a marketing arm and rubber stamper for the pharmaceutical industry. The CDC and key members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), including Dr. Paul Offit, hold vaccine patents that enrich them personally if they recommend their own vaccines. Conflict of interest much? ACIP is the committee that sets the childhood vaccine schedule. This means that its members can create a huge market of unsuspecting innocent children and parents for their products out of thin air by lobbying the other members to recommend their vaccine. In response to an investigation into this matter Dr. Paul Offit had this to say, among other absurd statements:
"I am a co-holder of a patent for a (rotavirus) vaccine. If this vaccine were to become a routinely recommended vaccine, I would make money off of that," Offit said. "When I review safety data, am I biased? That answer is really easy: absolutely not."
Intellectual Property expert Mark Blaxill dug into the patents owned by the CDC itself and found 56 vaccine patents. In perhaps the most blatant conflict of interest uncovered in this paper, the organization in charge of setting vaccine policy, monitoring vaccine safety and efficacy, and investigating whether vaccines are causing problems has tremendous financial interests in the sales of vaccines. How can we trust anything these people say, especially when their actions continually prove their allegiances are to the pharmaceutical industry and not the public?
Since the infamous 1986 Act that gave the pharmaceutical industry immunity from liability for vaccines, the childhood immunization schedule has ballooned from 12 shots to 54.
Has the deluge of new vaccines helped curtail infections as designed? The data clearly says...not so much.
Are children healthier now than they were in the 1980s? The answer is a resounding no. Between 1988 and 2011 the prevalence of chronic health conditions among children rose from 12.8% to 54%. There are certainly many contributing factors to this health crisis among children including a diet increasingly made up of highly processed, genetically modified, and pesticide drenched foods, but we also can’t ignore the idea that vaccines could be contributing as well. We know vaccines contain neurotoxic ingredients such as aluminum and mercury, carcinogenic ingredients such as formaldehyde and polysorbate 80, and auto-immune inducing ingredients such as aluminum, mercury, and polysorbate 80 once again. And yet, we are expected to just ignore the obvious fact that there is zero chance injecting these substances into children is good for them. Again, without a doubt the people attempting to decide what we put in our own bodies know all of this and they push forward anyway. Are their motives purely just financial or is money even enough to motivate someone to destroy the health of our children?
We can’t talk about CDC corruption without mentioning William Thompson, a senior scientist at the CDC who gave whistleblower testimony that he and his colleagues destroyed evidence that showed black boys who received the MMR vaccine before 36 months of age were at increased risk of autism. He released a public statement in 2014 and gave his testimony to congressman William Posey. To Mr. Posey’s credit, he tried to get an investigation into the matter launched and even resorted to reading Dr. Thompsons’s testimony on the House floor, including the following quote:
At the bottom of Table 7 it also shows that for the non-birth certificate sample, the adjusted race effect statistical significance was huge. All the authors and I met and decided sometime between August and September ’02 not to report any race effects for the paper. Sometime soon after the meeting, we decided to exclude reporting any race effects, the co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can. However, because I assumed it was illegal and would violate both FOIA and DOJ requests, I kept hard copies of all documents in my office and I retained all associated computer files. I believe we intentionally withheld controversial findings from the final draft of the Pediatrics paper.
Of course there was no investigation and the media swarmed on the damage control stories.
7. Media Corruption
The lynchpin to the world’s mass hypnosis is the media, and in the modern world that means legacy media and social media. As Jim Morrison famously said, “whoever controls the media, controls the mind.” The pharmaceutical industry spent $6.58 billion advertising their products in 2020. Do you think that amount of money might be enough to corrupt the companies they are giving it to? One of the most effective and influential ways to advertise anything is on social media. Pfizer took the top spot among pharmaceutical advertisers in 2020, spending $55 million. Do you think the big tech platforms like Facebook might want to retain and grow that revenue source? Do you think if they were asked to censor certain information that makes Pfizer or its vaccine look bad, they would do it? These are rhetorical questions because the answers are obvious. Anyone who follows medical experts on social media who share data that goes against the official narrative has seen an unprecedented level of censorship of scientific research. Their posts have been removed, scientists have been de-platformed, “fact-checker” blurbs are placed on every factual post, and media hit pieces are churned out regularly about scientists who are doing their best to warn the public that something is wrong. Perhaps the most insidious of the modern censorship habits is that of the “fact-checker”. The institutions that advertise themselves as the unbiased Ministry of Truth are anything but. They repeatedly censor valid scientific data and promote narratives that originate in politics rather than science. This is not surprising to anyone who understands that those who fund & control pharma also have tremendous influence over fact-checking organizations.
What’s more, both the media and the pharmaceutical industry are largely owned by the same asset management firms, Vanguard and BlackRock. And while these two behemoths might appear to be separate entities, Vanguard itself is the top investor in BlackRock so the dividing line is rather fuzzy. In some sense, we could look at these two as a single firm with the ability to exert unimaginable control over industry and the global economy. For instance, their combined ownership of Pfizer is 12.55%, a stake 2.5x bigger than the next largest investor.
When it comes to the New York Times, Vanguard and BlackRock are the top two investors again with a combined 15.54% ownership. They are also the top two owners of Time Warner, Comcast, Disney and News Corp, four of the six media companies that control more than 90% of the U.S. media landscape.
BlackRock and Vanguard have ownership in over 1,600 American firms, which in 2015 had combined revenues of $9.1 trillion. The power of these firms is so immense they even fund America’s privately owned central bank, The Federal Reserve.
These two companies have grown so powerful they form a global monopoly over almost every industry on Earth. Bloomberg even labeled BlackRock the fourth branch of government. They have the power to exert massive control over the world economy and shape the views held by most people through their media ownership. If we had a media that told us the truth, I wouldn’t need to write this paper because all of this would already be common knowledge. And while I have cited countless media articles here, for the most part I am citing specific data points from these articles and discarding the propaganda-soaked narratives that are spun around the facts.
8. Anthony Fauci Dossier
One of the central figures in all this madness has been director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (part of NIH) and the Chief Medical Advisor to the President, Dr. Anthony Fauci. While he is hailed as a hero by the media, he has a long history of dark deeds going back to the AIDS epidemic in the 80s. Anyone who examines his role there will see a familiar Fauci, whose every move benefits the pharmaceutical industry and leads to the death and destruction of countless people.
There are many prestigious outspoken critics of Fauci including Nobel laureate and PCR inventor Kary Mullis and Dr. Martin Kulldorff just to name a couple. One of the world’s top experts on intellectual property, patents and patent law including expertise as it relates to the medical field, David Martin, has painstakingly produced a 205 page dossier on Anthony Fauci that should be the foundation of a major criminal case against him. It details Anthony Fauci’s complete disregard for federal law including:
18 U.S.C. §2339 C et seq. – Funding and Conspiring to Commit Acts of Terror
18 U.S.C. § 2331 §§ 802 – Acts of Domestic Terrorism resulting in death of American Citizens
18 U.S.C. § 1001 – Lying to Congress
15 U.S.C. §1-3 – Conspiring to Criminal Commercial Activity
15 U.S.C. §8 – Market Manipulation and Allocation
21 C.F.R. § 50.24 et seq., Illegal Clinical Trial
Anthony Fauci’s actions as one of the top health officials in the country should have landed him in federal prison for the rest of his life long before COVID-19, and yet he has piled on the criminal acts during his leadership of this pandemic and is somehow still in charge of it. David Martin and others have put this dossier in the hands of attorneys general and federal prosecutors across the country and haven’t been able to find a single attorney with the honor and bravery required to take the case on. It’s clear we have a total breakdown and failure of our legislative system that has led to the two-tier justice system where those in power rarely ever see retribution for their murderous and destructive actions and common people are locked up for victimless “crimes” en masse.
9. Concluding Remarks
This sprawling exposé of the COVID-19 narratives that have sent the trajectory of the world toward an objectively darker place only represents the tip of the iceberg. With every passing day, this trajectory gains more inertia and gets more difficult to correct. The ones who will pay the most dearly for the biggest scandal of our time are the children growing up through it. We’re raising a generation who will have soon forgotten life without masks, normal interactions with friends, and a society that treats them as human beings rather than faceless disease spreaders. I have outlined the disastrous effects on children we’ve only begun to see, such as the mental health crisis currently destroying our youth and leading to the biggest surge in suicides and drug overdoses the world has ever seen.
After two years of hysteria, one thing should be crystal clear: government attempts to control this virus by controlling the actions of citizens have done far more harm than good. The available data overwhelmingly tells us that everything from mask mandates to vaccine mandates and coercion are doing the exact opposite of what the health officials say. Cases and deaths are higher than they were a year ago when there were no vaccines. The injuries and deaths from these rushed COVID-19 vaccines over the past year are higher than the last 30 years combined for all other vaccines. And yet, the push to segregate those who refuse to take it and deny them basic human rights marches forward.
The most powerful people in the world are at the center of this scandal and are using their resources and influence to control the flow of information so the average person is not informed. This very paper was published on medium.com and removed in a mere 20 minutes by their A.I. algorithm. No one bothered to read it or check the sources. Too many trigger keywords were matched and my book was burned. The foundation of modern medical policy is informed consent, and in order for the public to be informed we need access to information whether it’s inconvenient to the controllers of this world or not. This international policy came about via the Nuremberg Code in the aftermath of World War II and Nazi Germany’s intolerable medical experimentation on people. It requires medical professionals to inform people of all possible risks before any medical procedure is undertaken, especially those of an experimental nature like COVID-19 vaccines.
Money has no doubt corrupted our health. The regulatory agencies that are supposed to protect people from the predatory pharmaceutical industry have been captured and act as the enforcers and parrots for the industry. Government, media, big tech, and big pharma are all intertwined with the most powerful financial interests in the world, and the result is rapid deterioration of the health and livelihood of the common person across the globe. The scandal currently playing out before our eyes supersedes politics. No matter your philosophical or ideological leaning, the people that are supposed to be your public servants are failing you miserably.
We must correct this course immediately. The longer it takes to do so, the more the children of this world suffer. The more they suffer, the more the world at large will suffer when they enter adulthood as severely terrorized and traumatized individuals. We must remove the blinders that have been put in place by those who benefit from our mental enslavement. As a global civilization, we no longer have the luxury of the naive belief that the people in charge on Earth have our best interests at heart. In every imaginable instance, if you follow the money trail of tragedies in this world you will see the truth hiding in plain sight with a thin veil of propaganda protecting it from seeing the light of day. We must get up off the couch and remove that veil at all costs if we want our children to have even the slightest chance at living in a just and prosperous world.
Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance - Prevention and Treatment Protocols for COVID-19
Doctors For COVID Ethics - We are doctors and scientists from 30 countries, seeking to uphold medical ethics, patient safety and human rights in response to COVID-19
Physicians for Informed Consent - Delivering Data on Infectious Diseases and Vaccines
Canadian Covid Care Alliance - Independent, science-based evidence to empower Canadians
Informed Consent Action Network - Investigating the safety of medical procedures, pharmaceutical drugs, and vaccines while educating the public of their right to “informed consent.”
Learn The Risk - Educating people WORLDWIDE on the dangers of pharmaceutical products, including vaccines and unnecessary medical treatments — that are literally killing us.
GreenMedinfo - The Science of Natural Healing
Orthomolecular - Therapeutic Nutrition Based Upon Biochemical Individuality
Children’s Health Defense - The Science of Masks
CDC - “Provisional COVID-19 Deaths by Sex and Age” https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Provisional-COVID-19-Deaths-by-Sex-and-Age/9bhg-hcku/data
CDC - “Conditions contributing to deaths involving COVID-19, by age group, United States. Week ending 2/1/2020 to 12/5/2020”
OpenVAERS - “VAERS COVID Vaccine Adverse Event Reports”
Brownstone Institute - “123 Research Studies Affirm Naturally Acquired Immunity to Covid-19”
New England Journal of Medicine - “Waning of BNT162b2 Vaccine Protection against SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Qatar”
medRxiv - “Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections”
medRxiv - “Waning immunity of the BNT162b2 vaccine: A nationwide study from Israel”
CDC - “Historical Reference of Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Doses Distributed”
OpenVAERS - “VAERS COVID Vaccine Mortality Reports”
Our World in Data - “COVID-19 vaccine doses administered by manufacturer, United States”
Corporate Research Project - “Pfizer: Corporate Rap Sheet”
Department of Justice - “Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History”
Reuters - “Pfizer settles foreign bribery case with U.S. government”
The Guardian - “Pfizer pays out to Nigerian families of meningitis drug trial victims”
Washington Post - “Cable: Pfizer hired investigators to press Nigeria to drop suit”
New York Times - “Lawsuit Settled Over Heart Valve Implicated in About 300 Deaths”
New York Times - “Maker of Heart Valve Balks Over Some Warnings”
New York Times - “Pfizer Says 1999 Trials Revealed Risks With Celebrex”
Department of Justice - “WARNER-LAMBERT TO PAY $430 MILLION TO RESOLVE CRIMINAL & CIVIL HEALTH CARE LIABILITY RELATING TO OFF-LABEL PROMOTION”
Bloomberg - “Pfizer to Pay $142.1 Million Over Neurontin Marketing”
New York Times - “A Pfizer Whistle-Blower Is Awarded $1.4 Million”
Corporate Research Project - “Johnson & Johnson: Corporate Rap Sheet”
Department of Justice - “Johnson & Johnson to Pay More Than $2.2 Billion to Resolve Criminal and Civil Investigations”
Department of Justice - “McNeil-PPC Inc. Pleads Guilty in Connection with Adulterated Infants' and Children's Over-the-Counter Liquid Drugs”
Washington Post - “Maker of children's drugs accused of hiding Motrin recall from public”
North Carolina Department of Justice - “Attorney General Josh Stein Announces $26 Billion Agreement with Opioid Distributors/Manufacturer”
New York Times - “Guilty Plea By Division Of Drug Giant”
Newsweek - “Moderna Vaccine Recall Over Stainless Steel Contamination Caused by 'Human Error'”
The Guardian - “Third person dies in Japan after taking contaminated Moderna coronavirus vaccine”
Children’s Health Defense - “Part 1: Moderna Had a Long History of Failure. Then Along Came COVID.”
ClinicalTrials.gov - “ClinicalTrials.gov is a database of privately and publicly funded clinical studies conducted around the world.”
STAT - “Lavishly funded Moderna hits safety problems in bold bid to revolutionize medicine”
Nature - “Research not fit to print - Some biotech companies now eschew traditional publication in peer-reviewed journals. Does it matter?”
Opus Health - “Marijuana Incarcerations in the United States”
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine - “The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research”
Children’s Health Defense - “Big Pharma’s Big Spending on Lobbying Netted Big Contracts in 2020”
CNBC - “Goldman Sachs asks in biotech research report: ‘Is curing patients a sustainable business model?’”
The Hill - “For Big Pharma, the revolving door keeps spinning”
Forbes - “The Biopharmaceutical Industry Provides 75% Of The FDA's Drug Review Budget. Is This A Problem?”
MSN - “The FDA is broken. It's controversial approval of an ineffective new Alzheimer's drug proves the agency puts profit over public health.”
Public Citizen - “RE: The FDA’s reckless decision to approve aducanumab for treating Alzheimer’s disease”
Aaron Siri - “FDA Asks Federal Judge to Grant it Until the Year 2076 to Fully Release Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Data”
Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency
Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency vs Food and Drug Administration
Aaron Siri - “FDA Produces the First 91+ pages of Documents from Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine File”
Children’s Health Defense - “Conflict of Interest? Bill Gates Gave $319 Million to Major Media Outlets, Documents Reveal”
CDC - “Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD)”
OpenVAERS - “Frequently Asked Questions” (Who reports to VAERS)
Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Inc - “Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System”
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke - “Guillain-Barré Syndrome Fact Sheet”
Elsevier - “The reporting sensitivity of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for anaphylaxis and for Guillain-Barré syndrome”
The Telegraph - “Alarm grows as mortuaries fill with thousands of extra non-Covid deaths”
Office of National Statistics - “Deaths by vaccination status, England”
Alex Berenson - “Vaccinated English adults under 60 are dying at twice the rate of unvaccinated people the same age”
VigiAccess (World Health Organization)
Toby Rogers - “Extraordinary new chart from the warrior mamas at OpenVAERS”
CDC - “Myocarditis and Pericarditis After mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination”
American Heart Association - Circulation - “Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning”
Mayo Clinic - “Pericarditis”
YouTube - Kyle & April - Ride MTB - “Big Health Update / Checking In”
Children’s Health Defense - “NBA Player Says COVID Vaccine Caused Blood Clots, But Team Officials Told Him to ‘Keep Quiet’”
Children’s Health Defense - “Tennis Pro Says ‘Season Is Over’ After COVID Vaccine Injury, NBA Players Stand Firm Against Getting Vaccine”
Sovren Media - “More Footage of Athletes Collapsing On The Court”
Good Sciencing - “298 Athlete Cardiac Arrests, Serious Issues, 170 Dead, After COVID Shot” (December 10, 2021)
Reclaim The Net - “Facebook deletes 120,000-member group where people posted stories of alleged adverse vaccine reactions”
Chan Zuckerberg BioHub - “Disease knows no borders”
Jerusalem Post, Twitter
Scientific American - “Flu Has Disappeared for More Than a Year”
The Denver Channel - “Flu cases plummeted during the 2020-2021 season, CDC says”
Denis Rancourt - “Masks Don't Work - A review of science relevant to COVID-19 social policy”
Annals of Internal Medicine - “Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers”
Denis Rancourt - “Review of scientific reports of harms caused by face masks, up to February 2021”
medRxiv - “Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Child Cognitive Development: Initial Findings in a Longitudinal Observational Study of Child Health”
The Nobel Prize - “Kary B. Mullis”
YouTube - Dissociated Press - “Kary Mullis: ‘With PCR you can find almost ANYTHING in ANYBODY’”
Zenodo - “External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.”
CDC - National Vital Statistics System - “Guidance for Certifying COVID-19 Deaths”
Foundation for Economic Education - “Physicians Say Hospitals Are Pressuring ER Docs to List COVID-19 on Death Certificates. Here’s Why”
Bloomberg - “Almost 9 in 10 Covid-19 Patients on Ventilators Died in Study”
New York Post - “NYC doctor says high ventilator settings damage coronavirus patients’ lungs”
Yahoo News - “New York Will Seize And Redistribute Ventilators, Cuomo Says”
Huffington Post - “Trump Orders GM To Produce Ventilators, Invoking Defense Production Act”
AP News - “NY data show nursing home deaths undercounted by thousands”
American Council on Science and Health - “COVID Infection Fatality Rates By Sex And Age”
Newsweek - “COVID Cases Are Surging in the Five Most Vaccinated States”
MSN Health - “COVID Cases Are Falling in the Five Least Vaccinated States”
MSN Health - “U.S. has already seen more COVID deaths in 2021 than 2020 before vaccines were available, as experts again warn pandemic is not over”
Springer - “Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States”
FOX26 - “How COVID-19 Jab Benefits Are Exaggerated”
Darrell Huff - “How to Lie With Statistics”
The Lancet - “The epidemiological relevance of the COVID-19-vaccinated population is increasing”
Principia Scientific International - “2010: Rockefeller’s ‘Operation Lockstep’ Predicted 2020 ‘Lockdown’”
The Rockefeller Foundation - “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”
Daily Wire - “Top Australian State Official: We’re Transferring Positive COVID Cases To Quarantine Camps”
Elsevier - “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?”
Canadian COVID Care Alliance - Dr. Byram W. Bridle, PhD - “COVID-19 Vaccines and Children: A Scientist’s Guide for Parents”
The Great Barrington Declaration
The Great Barrington Declaration - “Signatures”
Geert Vanden Bossche
Geert Vanden Bossche - “How remaining in the dark and turning in vicious circles inevitably leads to erroneous decisions”
YouTube - JVDW Music - “Brought to you by Pfizer”
BIJOG - Luc Montagnier
Nobel Prize - “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2008”
UncoverDC - “Nobel Laureate Warns: COVID Vaccine is Creating Variants”
LinkedIn - Dr Kevin McCairn PhD
Dr. Richard Fleming
Dr. Richard Fleming - “The International Criminal Court”
American Chemical Society - “Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 Evolution Revealing Vaccine-Resistant Mutations in Europe and America”
British Medical Journal (BMJ) - “Peter Doshi”
British Medical Journal (BMJ) - “Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us”
Sharryl Atkinson - “CDC changes definition of "vaccines" to fit Covid-19 vaccine limitations”
Institute for Vaccine Safety (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health) - “Excipients in Vaccines per 0.5 mL dose”
Learn The Risk - “DO YOU KNOW WHAT’S IN A VACCINE?”
Health Resources & Services Administration - “About the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program”
Health Resources & Services Administration - “National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program - Data & Statistics”
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - “Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act”
CNBC - “Compensation for victims of Covid vaccine injuries is limited”
Harvard - “MARTIN KULLDORFF, PhD”
Stanford - “Jayanta Bhattacharya”
Newsweek - “How Fauci Fooled America”
VOA News - “Fauci Defends Coronavirus Vaccination Mandates”
Financial Times - “Coronavirus tracked: see how your country compares”
Project Gutenberg - “THE HISTORY OF THE PELOPONNESIAN WAR”
Brownstone Institute - “Hospitals Should Hire, Not Fire, Nurses with Natural Immunity”
Foundation for Economic Education - “Massive Nurse Shortage Hits Houston—Weeks After 150 Unvaccinated Nurses and Hospital Workers Fired”
Folkhälsomyndigheten, Public Health Agency of Sweden - “Covid-19 in schoolchildren”
New England Journal of Medicine - “Open Schools, Covid-19, and Child and Teacher Morbidity in Sweden”
Jordan Schachtel - “Dr. Flip Flop: A timeline of Fauci's school reopening positions”
MSN - “Dr. Makary Says Natural Immunity Is More Effective Then Vaccine Immunity”
The Spectator - “Covid, lockdown and the retreat of scientific debate”
American Institute for Economic Research - “Twitter Censors Famed Epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff”
The Federalist - “CDC Punishes ‘Superstar’ Scientist For COVID Vaccine Recommendation The CDC Followed 4 Days Later”
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases - “NIAID Budget Data Comparisons”
Martin Kulldorff, Twitter
FDA - “Emergency Use Authorization for Vaccines Explained”
British Medical Journal - “Intravenous high-dose vitamin C for the treatment of severe COVID-19: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial”
University of Chicago Medicine - “Study suggests high vitamin D levels may protect against COVID-19, especially for Black people”
The Lancet - “Inhaled budesonide in the treatment of early COVID-19 (STOIC): a phase 2, open-label, randomised controlled trial”
“COVID-19 early treatment: real-time analysis of 1,194 studies”
Market Watch - “How much is Big Pharma making from COVID-19 vaccines? We’re about to find out”
American Journal of Therapeutics - “Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines”
American Journal of Therapeutics - “Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19”
Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance - “The Latest Results of Ivermectin’s Success in Treating Outbreaks of COVID-19”
Children’s Health Defense - “Conflict of Interest: Reuters ‘Fact Checks’ COVID-Related Social Media Posts, But Fails to Disclose Ties to Pfizer, World Economic Forum”
Reclaim the Net - “Gates Foundation funds Facebook fact-checkers that defend it from allegations”
American Journal of Epidemiology - “Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High-Risk COVID-19 Patients That Should Be Ramped Up Immediately as Key to the Pandemic Crisis”
The Palmer Foundation - “WHO and UK trials use potentially lethal hydroxychloroquine dose-according to WHO consultant”
The Lancet - “RETRACTED: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis”
New York Times - “The Pandemic Claims New Victims: Prestigious Medical Journals”
The Corbett Report - “What is the WHO?”
Children’s Health Defense - “New Documentary on WHO Exposes Widespread Corruption, Massive Funding by Bill Gates”
National Whistleblower Center - “Celebrating Whistleblowers”
British Medical Journal - “Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial”
The Intercept - “PFIZER IS LOBBYING TO THWART WHISTLEBLOWERS FROM EXPOSING CORPORATE FRAUD”
GreenMedinfo - “Examining RFK Jr.'s claim that the CDC “Owns over 20 vaccine patents.”
United Press International - “UPI Investigates: The vaccine conflict”
Health Choice - “Mark Blaxill”
Children’s Health Defense - “CDC Recommended Vaccine Schedule 1986 vs. 2019”
Learn The Risk - “THE FACTS ARE CLEAR: INFECTIOUS DISEASE DEATHS DECLINED NEARLY 90% BEFORE VACCINES WERE INTRODUCED…”
Children’s Health Defense - “Chronic Illness in Children—Who Is Sounding the Alarm?”
Morgan Verkamp LLC - “STATEMENT OF WILLIAM W. THOMPSON, Ph.D., REGARDING THE 2004 ARTICLE EXAMINING THE POSSIBILITY OF A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MMR VACCINE AND AUTISM”
Forbes - “A Congressman, A CDC Whisteblower And An Autism Tempest In A Trashcan”
Fierce Pharma - “The top 10 ad spenders in Big Pharma for 2020”
Children’s Health Defense - “The Panic Pandemic: How Media Fearmongering Led to ‘Unprecedented’ Censorship of Scientific Research”
Children’s Health Defense - “How Facebook’s ‘Fact Check’ Feature Suppresses Truth, Promotes Falsehoods About COVID-19”
Children’s Health Defense - “How Bill Gates Controls Global Messaging and Censorship”
Children’s Health Defense - “Who Owns Big Pharma + Big Media? You’ll Never Guess.”
Global Issues - “Media Conglomerates, Mergers, Concentration of Ownership”
American Monetary Institute - “Is the Federal Reserve System a Governmental or a Privately controlled organization?”
Bloomberg - “In Fink We Trust: BlackRock Is Now ‘Fourth Branch of Government’”
Children’s Health Defense - “Fauci Botched the AIDS Epidemic so Big Pharma Could Profit. He’s Doing It Again With COVID.”
David Martin World - “About David Martin”
David Martin World - “The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier”
British Medical Journal - “The Nuremberg Code (1947)”